Even more important... REST over AMQP will be the superior choice in the future imho. Small messages shared between java and non java consumers. FTW! :)
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Bill Burke <bbu...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On 2/28/11 6:10 AM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote: >> >> Bill, >> >> I'm starting a new thread... >> >> Comments inline. >> >>> >>> I think its fair to suggest to somebody asking about JMS integration >>> solutions other than CXF. We encourage such posts on resteasy mail list. >> > > Especially since hornetq rest can be consumed by CXF. > >> Sure - unless we reckon we can provide something meaningful at the CXF >> level ? >> > > FYI, I've tried very very hard to minimalize, lessen, remove the requirement > or need for a specific client framework or stack other than HTTP to consume > hornetq's REST interface. IMO, anybody writing a REST interface should make > similar efforts. Because, otherwise, what's the point? > > I also think we have to be very very careful from a REST framework > perspective to avoid marrying/coupling our frameworks to a developer's > application. Once you've created the requirement for a framework to be > installed both on the client and server, you've done something wrong. > > All this is why I piped in when somebody asked about JMS integration. > Because I believe really strongly about the above. SOAP+JMS is really a > consideration only for cross-language/platform interoperability. REST, IMO, > is a superior approach because of the reasons listed above. Since CXF is > now embracing REST through its JAX-RS implementation, alternatives to > SOAP-based approaches should be suggested and encouraged, at least by the > REST guys at CXF ;) > >> >> P.S. Bill - you are welcome to contribute and challenge us on the dev >> list. Sorry if the previous thread caused you some grief :-). I >> believe no-one meant anything more than just a protective remark. It >> is obvious now it turned out to be a highly controversial one but hope >> such a seasoned professional as you are can accept the attempted >> clarifications and apologies which followed :-) >> > > My "grief" usually doesn't last more than 2 seconds and I've received much > much worse grief before. If I was more professional, and I'm not, I would > have just ignored Glen's comments. Instead, I just couldn't resist the urge > to tweak him, for that I apologize. > > -- > Bill Burke > JBoss, a division of Red Hat > http://bill.burkecentral.com >
