you mean using AMQP as a marshalling format?
On 2/28/11 10:29 AM, James Carr wrote:
Even more important... REST over AMQP will be the superior choice in
the future imho. Small messages shared between java and non java
consumers. FTW! :)
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Bill Burke<bbu...@redhat.com> wrote:
On 2/28/11 6:10 AM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
Bill,
I'm starting a new thread...
Comments inline.
I think its fair to suggest to somebody asking about JMS integration
solutions other than CXF. We encourage such posts on resteasy mail list.
Especially since hornetq rest can be consumed by CXF.
Sure - unless we reckon we can provide something meaningful at the CXF
level ?
FYI, I've tried very very hard to minimalize, lessen, remove the requirement
or need for a specific client framework or stack other than HTTP to consume
hornetq's REST interface. IMO, anybody writing a REST interface should make
similar efforts. Because, otherwise, what's the point?
I also think we have to be very very careful from a REST framework
perspective to avoid marrying/coupling our frameworks to a developer's
application. Once you've created the requirement for a framework to be
installed both on the client and server, you've done something wrong.
All this is why I piped in when somebody asked about JMS integration.
Because I believe really strongly about the above. SOAP+JMS is really a
consideration only for cross-language/platform interoperability. REST, IMO,
is a superior approach because of the reasons listed above. Since CXF is
now embracing REST through its JAX-RS implementation, alternatives to
SOAP-based approaches should be suggested and encouraged, at least by the
REST guys at CXF ;)
P.S. Bill - you are welcome to contribute and challenge us on the dev
list. Sorry if the previous thread caused you some grief :-). I
believe no-one meant anything more than just a protective remark. It
is obvious now it turned out to be a highly controversial one but hope
such a seasoned professional as you are can accept the attempted
clarifications and apologies which followed :-)
My "grief" usually doesn't last more than 2 seconds and I've received much
much worse grief before. If I was more professional, and I'm not, I would
have just ignored Glen's comments. Instead, I just couldn't resist the urge
to tweak him, for that I apologize.
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com
