On Sat, 8 Jul 2023 at 00:03, Shane Curcuru <a...@shanecurcuru.org> wrote:
>
> Jarek Potiuk wrote on 7/6/23 4:52 PM:
> ...snip...
> > The conclusion of the discussion we had last week was that we want to get a
> > statically generated website - based on the same tooling and ASF
> > integration tooling as https://github.com/apache/comdev-site is. We will
> > eventually make it available at eu.communityovercode.org and (secondary)
> > goal of that is to make it a nice starting point for future other
> > communityovercode sites (NA one is currently run via wordpress). Some of
> > the committee members are particularly keen on transparency and
> > archiving/inclusivity, so rather than creating a repo outside of ASF (which
> > is an option) we thought the best will be to get a repo in the "apache"
> > organisation.
> >
> >  From the JIRA ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-24741 - if
> > we were to use INFRA supported GitHub repos (under the apache/
> > organisation) we need a "project" to host it and Rich suggested that
> > instead of creating a new one we could do it via comdev.
>
> Yes, any event website source should definitely be stored in an ASF repo
> (i.e. svn or on github under 'apache').
>
> On the infra ticket it was mentioned that VP Conferences could be the
> owner if they created an LDAP group, which is the "most appropriate"
> place to host the content, since the VP Conferences is in charge.  But
> it might be simpler to manage if we used this PMC instead - although
> that requires some consensus from this PMC first to own something that
> really belongs to conferences.
>
> One note: do you *specifically* want to copy the ComDev site repo?  Or
> do you want to start with the infra-supported (but simpler design)

My experience with both Hugo and Pelican is that Hugo is easier to customise.

> template repo they recommend for new projects?
>    https://github.com/apache/template-site

I don't think that is production ready.

>    https://template.staged.apache.org/
>
>
> > We have some specific requirement re: access to the repository. We are not
> > a typical PMC where we have committers and PMC members. We are cooperating
> > with a producer company (Software Guru) and rather than merging their PRs
> > we would rather (especially at the crucial times before the event) want to
> > give them direct "push" access and capability of merging PRs.
> >
> > So my question is:
> >
> > * has something like that been done before?
> > * is this possible for comdev projects to have such repos
> > (apache/comdev-commovercode-eu) with external people access ?
>
> No.  AFAIK any direct write access to /apache repos can only come from
> ASF committers who have signed an ICLA.  But that's solvable for a
> special case like this, by having an officer or PMC simply agree to
> invite those outside individuals at Software Guru to be committers here.
>   Note also that individuals can be made committers, not companies.
>
> --
> - Shane
>    ComDev PMC
>    The Apache Software Foundation
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org

Reply via email to