Le jeu. 17 févr. 2022 à 17:58, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > [...] GitHub's integration > with email for its various notification things (where you can reply > directly to the email to have your message posted back to GitHub) > makes the concept a bit more of a two-way street similar to the git > repositories themselves.
Does that exist today? What happens in the "Commons" project, is that an email generated in the GitHub eco-system is sent from e.g. "issues@": If a "reply", it will be sent back to that ML, not GH (IIUC)... > On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 7:26 PM Gilles Sadowski <gillese...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Le mer. 16 févr. 2022 à 18:55, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> a écrit : > > > > > > To repeat what I have written elsewhere on this topic in the past: > > > > > > Project communication channels should be: > > > > > > - Public. The decision making process should be open and visible to > > > everyone. It should also be easy for people to find. > > > > > > - Searchable. So anyone can look-up past discussions. > > > > > > - Asynchronous. To enable participation from a globally distributed > > > community. > > > > > > - ASF owned archive. So we always have access to past discussions. > > > > > > - Low overhead. Community members may not have access to powerful PCs > > > or high-speed and/or reliable internet. The lower the overhead of a > > > communication channel, the greater the potential for participation. > > > > > > - Usable off-line. Helps those with poor / intermittent / expensive > > > internet access and those who are off-line for other reasons (e.g. > > > traveling) Do any of the mentioned alternatives fulfill those requirements? Many people listed the concrete (objective) advantages of the (so-called "old") ML technology over other ways of communication "back then" (snail mail, phone calls, etc.). Several aspects of the new/fashionable tools blatantly contradict one or more of the above requirements. And none match them all for the intended purpose. Or did I miss something? Regards, Gilles > > > > > > > > > I wonder if something like matrix[1] could be a way to enable people to > > > communicate via their platform of choice whilst retaining our archived > > > mailing lists as the canonical view. > > > > > > Mark > > > > > > > > > [1] https://matrix.org/ > > > > Is INFRA investigating? > > > > Gilles > > > > >> [...] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org
