Le mer. 16 févr. 2022 à 18:55, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> a écrit :
>
> To repeat what I have written elsewhere on this topic in the past:
>
> Project communication channels should be:
>
> - Public. The decision making process should be open and visible to
>    everyone. It should also be easy for people to find.
>
> - Searchable. So anyone can look-up past discussions.
>
> - Asynchronous. To enable participation from a globally distributed
>    community.
>
> - ASF owned archive. So we always have access to past discussions.
>
> - Low overhead. Community members may not have access to powerful PCs
>    or high-speed and/or reliable internet. The lower the overhead of a
>    communication channel, the greater the potential for participation.
>
> - Usable off-line. Helps those with poor / intermittent / expensive
>    internet access and those who are off-line for other reasons (e.g.
>    traveling)
>
>
> I wonder if something like matrix[1] could be a way to enable people to
> communicate via their platform of choice whilst retaining our archived
> mailing lists as the canonical view.
>
> Mark
>
>
> [1] https://matrix.org/

Is INFRA investigating?

Gilles

>> [...]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org

Reply via email to