(X) This should be formalized ( ) this should not be formalized or proposed because:
I vote +1 formalize a proposal for project hosting. On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 7:57 AM Matthew Sacks <matt...@matthewsacks.com> wrote: > I’m not sure wtf it doing but this GT relying on the elder buffers and > more experienced guidance (specifically Mark Thomas, JimJag’s input, Brett > Porter) here goes: can we vote yes or no should this be turned into a > proposal of some kind, incubator or other, depending on where it is most > appropriated. > > Calling a vote yes or no to create a formal application for project > hosting in the ASF for the PoC. > > PoC success criteria TBD. > > I’ve proposed one podling before, but I’m rusty on this process. > > Ready to dedicate resources to this project. > > > > On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 7:47 AM Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> Le mar. 6 avr. 2021 à 14:27, Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> a écrit : >> >> > >> > >> > On 4/6/21 3:59 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: >> > > Le mar. 6 avr. 2021 à 02:56, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> >> a >> > > écrit : >> > > >> > >> The other issue I see is how are the badges awarded?... >> > >> >> > > >> > > IMO the only fair and "safe" way is to have factual badges. Things >> like >> > > "committer", "PMC member", "took the ASF media training" etc which are >> > all >> > > facts. >> > >> > Counterpoint: That's incredibly boring, and kind of negates the purpose >> > of doing a fun thing in the first place... >> > >> >> Ok, I have zero experience with that but I am willing to learn and enjoy, >> as long as the whole thing is clearly presented as tongue in cheek and >> made >> for fun. >> >> Bertrand >> > -- > Thank you, Matthew > -- Thank you, Matthew
