On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 at 15:58, Pierre Smits <pierresm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> I bow to Naomi for keeping reacting in this thread and not giving in to a
> desire to step out of the discussion...
>
> I find it sad that there are (board) members who keep saying that the
> situation must improve (because there are problems regarding Diversity and
> Inclusion), but when it comes to where it needs to improve (in the projects
> mostly) they also keep saying (here and other threads also in other fora in
> the past) that there is nothing to be done from the Foundation downwards to
> the projects because 'the projects are independent'.
>
> In my book there is where the view-points of those persons go of in wrong
> directions. Yes, projects are expected to operate independently from
> outside influence. But they can not operate independently from the
> organisation they reside under. In a page (See [1]) of the ASF it is stated
> that 'the board delegates the technical direction of all projects to each
> PMC', but 'are expected to follow corporate policies'. This means that the
> policies can be created at Foundation level, and can be policed (by the
> Board, and/or through delegation by a specific office). If the highest body
> of the Foundation established a strict(er) policy on 'merit awarding'
> and/or 'Diversity & Inclusion' then it is obliged, with regards to these
> policies, to:
>
>    1. ensure that each of the lower level organisational units (OUs like
>    projects/offices/departments, etc.) acknowledge and apply such policies
>    2. regularly (and independently of the projects and offices) assess the
>    adherence to (or compliance with) the policies
>    3. actively implement corrective measures when an OU fails to adhere to
>    or comply with such policy.
>
>
> Mark suggested in a posting earlier that there is something called the D&I
> team that could be tasked with gathering advice from domain experts, and
> advise the President/Board on how to improve this situation. But it seems
> (I have done some searching on ASF pages regarding this D&I team) the team
> has not been established formally and thus no insights on its mission and
> production can be established. Maybe that still needs to happen? Or is it
> flying very low under the radar, or.... ?

Huh?

Quoting Mark from earlier:

>> We have a D&I
>> team (diversity and inclusion) at work. I could approach them for some
>> recommendations. Thoughts?

i.e. there is a D&I team *at his work place*

> Whatever it may be (visages the D&I team), here are some suggestions that
> may lead to an improved situation:
>
>    1. Communicate (e.g. via the ASF's web site) clearly where contributors,
>    who feel they were wronged, can submit complaints;
>    2. Treat complaints (and their submitters) seriously and discretely;
>    3. Have a protocol published so that everybody can learn about what to
>    expect and when to expect it.
>
>
> [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/governance/
> [2] http://community.apache.org/projectIndependence
>
> Best regards,
>
> Pierre Smits
>
> *Apache Trafodion <https://trafodion.apache.org>, Vice President*
> *Apache Directory <https://directory.apache.org>, PMC Member*
> Apache Incubator <https://incubator.apache.org>, committer
> *Apache OFBiz <https://ofbiz.apache.org>, contributor (without having
> privileges) since 2008*
> Apache Steve <https://steve.apache.org>, committer
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 3:53 PM Naomi Slater <n...@tumbolia.org> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 at 15:51, Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I fail to see how this would affect the actual work that needs to get
> > > done. I have long since stopped caring about *persuading* our skeptic
> > > members about the need to do this work. They're not going to help
> > > anyways, why bother? And we already have the full support of the
> > > President and the Board on this, so they can't interfere in any
> > > meaningful way.
> > >
> >
> > fair point :)
> >
> >
> > > *That* is why I think that this nitpicking is irrelevant. If other folks
> > > wish to discuss whether it's 2% or 3%, sure, go ahead. It feels like
> > > debating the brand of mop we should be using when we're 8 feet under
> > water.
> > >
> >
> > lmao!
> >

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org

Reply via email to