On 3/26/19 11:06 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
It is great to see that we want our outbound comms regarding this improved. But what is worse is that, while there are these great talks about improving this here in comdev and foundation, the flaw remains at project level where people do get disregarded for receiving privileges because they don't fit the profile that individual PMC members have of the ideal privileged contributor, and vocalise that in such a way that when it comes to a vote it is a veto in all but the word. Not only do the outbound communication need to improve, but more importantly the oversight and policing needs to improve.
It's difficult to imagine a scenario, at Apache, where there would be *policing* of this concept. I'm not even sure what you mean. Are you suggesting that someone (ComDev? The Board?) would *force* a project to accept someone that they have determined is somehow contrary to the mission or vision of their project?
-- Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com http://rcbowen.com/ @rbowen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org
