On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 at 13:05, Jay Vyas <jayunit100.apa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Agree / propose: remove all private communication.
I don't think that is feasible. There are some discussions that must happen in private. For example, reports of security issues and personnel discussions. > Other foundations are becoming more open then us Is there any data to support that assertion? How can one know if another foundation is using private mailing lists or not? > and the overhead of managing the process is in and of itself a cost we can’t > afford in a fast moving world. I'm not sure what overhead you are referring to here. > > On Dec 6, 2018, at 8:02 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > >> On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 12:57 PM Julian Foad <julianf...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Julian Foad wrote on 2018-09-14: > >>> TL;DR: Is [an obvious-looking address] the root of the problem? Need > >>> [-public and -private variants of said address]? > >> Can anyone second this proposal or otherwise comment on it?.. > > > > I read the quoted text but don't understand exactly what it is that > > you are suggesting, an example would probably help. > > > > -Bertrand > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org
