On 12/21/16, 12:10 PM, "William A Rowe Jr" <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
>On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > >> >> On 12/21/16, 11:05 AM, "Pierre Smits" <pierre.sm...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >To much work? For whom? In what period? >> >Does is require a combined effort? A plan? Or just a firing from the >>hip? >> >> Well, I think it would be good to get a new number "soon". Sounded like >> Daniel could get a number from commits quickly. Not sure how hard it >> would be to add in mailing list activity. But opening the discussion to >> where else to look and actually looking made me think it would take >>longer >> and more energy than it was worth. Hopefully folks who earned commit >> rights for spending time elsewhere occasionally drop by their dev@. >>They >> should just so folks can know what is going on only by following dev@. >> >> Just my 2 cents though. I won't be doing the work or stopping anyone >>from >> trying. >> > >The biggest hassle with email activity is cross-correlating all of the >possible >email aliases for some 6000 people, no longer really practical. committer >id >is still easier if there were a way to collect git activity as well as svn >based >projects. Agreed. I was wondering if the forwarding email address stored at id.apache.org would net enough to be significant or not. That's the email where you received the survey notice. If you use that to send anything to an ASF list we add you to the count. -Alex
