On 12/21/2016 03:09 AM, "Ulrich Stärk" wrote: > On Tue, December 20, 2016 17:11, Rich Bowen wrote: >> >> >> On 12/19/2016 08:36 AM, Sharan F wrote: >>> Hello Everyone >>> >>> A big thank you to everyone that has helped or participated in getting >>> the Committer Diversity Survey out, and also to all the committers that >>> responded to the survey. It has been really good to be able to collect >>> this information and see what it tells us about our committer base. >>> >>> I've loaded the main data and graphs from the survey onto the Community >>> Development wiki (see link below) >>> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COMDEV/ASF+Committer+Diversity+Survey+-+2016 >>> >>> >>> In total we received 765 responses (out of a 5861 committer base at the >>> time the survey was run) so around a 13% response rate. >> >> It would be useful to pursue Niclas' assertion that most of our >> registered committers are inactive. I'd think that if we define >> "inactive" in some measurable way, we could determine some actual >> numbers around that. > > Since everything these days is going through LDAP it should be possible to > get e.g. last login timestamp. Maybe reach out to infra?
Sure, if that's our definition of "active". Likewise, if "commit" is our definition of "active", that seems easy too. I tend to think that "active" is a bit more complex, but either one of those would give us a good first estimate. -- Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
