What are you looking for, exactly? I'm not sure what a "use-case" is in this context.
We have a concrete example of what not to do in this very thread already. I was contacted off-list by Niclas making it clear he expected me to provide proof that would "convince" him that I wasn't trying to "breed" a "a cry-baby and victimhood culture". Is this really the sort of thing we want to tolerate when a member of community mentions that they've had bad experiences before. Is this sort of thing the "inclusivity" and "welcoming-ness" we aim for? As it happens, I wasn't bringing up my bad experiences to make any concrete point about what we should or should not do re policy, only to refute Niclas's nonsense idea that "safety" is not a word we should be using. On Tue, 15 Nov 2016 at 16:58 Patricia Shanahan <p...@acm.org> wrote: > On 11/15/2016 6:48 AM, Noah Slater wrote: > ... > > You want some sort of "record" to consume. Is a person, on a mailing > list, > > saying "hey this place was so bad for me I had to take a break" not > > evidence enough for you that something might be wrong? > > > > As for the rest of it, this org keeps records of every email sent to the > > lists. It would not be hard for you to go looking for context if you > wanted > > it. > > > > Asking me to go over all that stuff again (which I find upsetting to even > > think about) days after returning here hoping things would be nicer for > me, > > is, well, ... it's not particularly considerate. > ... > > I don't think asking you to go over something you found upsetting is > necessary. On the other hand, I have started looking at the mail > archives for your 2015 participation, and I don't think I have found the > right context, or if I have I am not recognizing it. > > Could you perhaps save some time by giving a pointer in terms of e.g. a > mailing list and topic? > > Or, if you prefer we not discuss your particular situation, could you > give a pointer to any use-case, in terms of mailing list and topic? > > This very discussion is an illustration of why "feeling" based standards > are a problem. Some people are not comfortable setting policies without > solid use-cases they can discuss and analyze. Others may not be > comfortable with discussion and analysis of those use-cases. How does > one accommodate both sets of feelings? > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org > >
