Ideally and aspirationally, that is true. Practically speaking, definitely not true.
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) < ross.gard...@microsoft.com> wrote: > Once again, the ASF makes no distinction between code and other > contributions. > > Sent from Windows Mail > > From: Roman Shaposhnik<mailto:ro...@shaposhnik.org> > Sent: ?Sunday?, ?March? ?8?, ?2015 ?5?:?21? ?PM > To: ComDev<mailto:dev@community.apache.org> > > On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 3:08 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> > wrote: > >> On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) > >> <ross.gard...@microsoft.com> wrote: > >>> Who said we allow it for engineers? My position is the same for any > community member no matter what they do. > >> > >> It is all over LI and resumes. Here's a good example: > >> https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=759319 > >> "Developer at Apache Maven" > >> > > > > But he is an Apache Maven developer. (and committer, and PMC member). > > That's very different than hiring someone off the street with a $bigco > > job title of Maven Developer with no standing in the community. > > How is it different if a person is considered a bonafide member of > the community but his contributions are not code? Why that person > can't have a similar title? > > Thanks, > Roman. >
