Last reply on this thread for today ;-) On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Joe Brockmeier <j...@zonker.net> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 8, 2015, at 05:09 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > As a title provided by a company, I would be against any title that > incorporates the name of an Apache project. Red Hat, for instance, can > employ (and grant the title) the "Fedora Project Leader" and Novell can > employ the "openSUSE Community Manager," but none of the companies are > entitled to give a title related to any Apache project.
Now I think we're really getting somewhere: it seems to be that some confusion (definitely mine at least) stems from the fact of of who can actually grant that title. The example of I gave with Brett -- clearly the ASF community was the one bestowing that title. Now, quite contrary to the semantics game that Ross was playing with 'what is an official title anyway?' -- I'd say that at that point it becomes one of Brett's official titles. Which means that even if there's a *corporate* announcement of him doing an event he can be billed as: Bret, Developer at Apache Maven Can we agree on that? Thanks, Roman.
