On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote: > ...*historically*, when this kind of thing has happened (project implements, > thing becomes critical), gradually it becomes the responsibility of Infra, > not of the project, to do ongoing maintenance....
Yes, this is why I'm reluctant to encourage any initiative that requires our infrastructure team to support new tools. And I suspect infra shares that reluctance ;-) That being said, it's always a question of benefits vs. costs - but if a simple thing using technologies that every web developer is supposed to know works the choice is a no-brainer for me. -Bertrand
