On Wed, 22 Oct 2025 at 00:48, Gilles Sadowski <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Le mar. 21 oct. 2025 à 23:59, sebb <[email protected]> a écrit :
> >
> > On Tue, 21 Oct 2025 at 18:09, Gilles Sadowski <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > >
> > > > > The Project logotype must use the word "Apache", not "The ASF"
> > >
> > > This is not true.  Quoting Mark Thomas (VP "Trademarks"):
> > > ---CUT---
> > > My very strong recommendation is that if a project wants to include the
> > > project name in their logo then they either use
> > >   "<Project>"
> > > or
> > >   "Apache <Project>"
> > > and do not use
> > >   "ASF <Project>"
> > > ---CUT---
> > >
> > > As argued on JIRA, I strongly favour "Commons"
> >
> > However Mark also said[1]:
> >
> > ---CUT---
> > There are a small number of projects where registering the bare name
> > would be challenging (Commons is one of them).
> > Using the name full name "Apache Commons" allows the Commons project
> > to gain the protection afforded by our registrations of the Apache
> > mark.
> > ---CUT---
>
> Neither the ASF nor anyone else should feel entitled to claim ownership
> of the word "commons".
>
> > If we drop the Apache prefix then this protection will not be available.
>
> Are you (and Mark) saying that the "Apache Commons" _project_ will be at
> risk if our _logo_ does not contain the word "Apache"?
> Which "protection" are you talking about?  What is the "risk" of "commons"
> being used in other contexts?  Why would you even think of preventing that?
> Of course, there is a restriction to other entities using "Apache Commons"
> because this is the registered trademark of this project; my understanding is
> that it holds whatever the logo may be.
>
> I want to be consistent with the rationale that led to the (ASF) logo change.
>
> Limiting the use of "Apache" to the strict minimum is the right thing to do.
>
> A logo does not need to contain "Apache" any more than it needs to contain
> "Commons".  For that matter, a really original graphical logo would likely be
> much easier to protect than a wordmark that is an English word.

These are questions for Mark.

> Gilles
>
> >
> > Sebb
> > [1] 
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMMONSSITE-179?focusedCommentId=18031079&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-18031079
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to