On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 11:45 AM Gilles Sadowski <gillese...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Le lun. 10 févr. 2025 à 11:25, Arnout Engelen <enge...@apache.org> a
> écrit :
> > Do you mean we should leave out the whole line or just the "Thanks to
> > Dependabot" part?
>
> The whole line.
>
> > I tried to follow the convention from other Commons projects where each
> > dependency update gets such a line in the changelog.
>
> Well, the "convention" in math-related components was to follow the
> previous convention. ;-)  Which was to do such dependency updates
> when deemed necessary (by a human), usually at the latest before a
> release.
>
> > I don't mind the lines
> > in the change log too much (it seems useful to see what got updated,
> > especially when we group update lines in the log).
>
> Information is useful; such updates "inter-releases" is not IMHO.
>
> As it stands, I prefer to not rely on Dependabot to do the change; the
> useful part of that tool is to make checks, and "say" that it would be
> harmless to update.
>

Gotcha, I didn't realize different commons- components had different ways
of working here, sorry about that.

So for commons-math, you'd prefer Dependabot PRs to be created but not
merged (or at least not during regular development), right? Shall I
configure a '[not for merge]' prefix (
https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/dependabot/dependabot-version-updates/customizing-dependabot-prs#adding-a-prefix-to-commit-messages)
for the generated commit/PR titles? Otherwise I'm sure I'll forget and run
afoul of this again :).


Kind regards,

-- 
Arnout Engelen
ASF Security Response
Apache Pekko PMC member, ASF Member
NixOS Committer
Independent Open Source consultant

Reply via email to