> This is different Emanuel, Dependabot did in fact do all the work. I don't think we would suggest not giving authorship if a person did the work. That work is extremely valuable IMO, especially considering the OS x Java version matrix.
Gary, root of the problem is as I described before, you and Gilles have different idea for the work of dependabot. You think its work is meaningful, he think its work be not only non meaningful but even negative. IMO Gilles knows a bot who did great positive work shall be thankful, but he just don't think dependabot worth it... sigh, apache commons are not that common in all ideas. Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> 于2025年2月10日周一 20:34写道： > This is different Emanuel, Dependabot did in fact do all the work. I don't > think we would suggest not giving authorship if a person did the work. That > work is extremely valuable IMO, especially considering the OS x Java > version matrix. > > Gary > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2025, 05:34 Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org> wrote: > > > On 10/02/2025 10:20, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > > > The commit below will generate a line in the release notes that says > > > "Thanks to Dependabot". > > > I don't that it is useful (IMHO, it is even harmful if it is littered > > > with hardly > > > informative automated messages that drown functional changes). > > > Fine if there is an easy and safe way to update a dependency, but > > > should we thank a robot? > > > > +1, otherwise we may also thank Git, IntelliJ and OpenJDK for every > > release :) > > > > Emmanuel Bourg > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > >
