Awesome, thank you Sebb! Gary
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021, 12:11 sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Good idea. > > I have done that for commons-codec, and GH has now agreed to use AL2.0 > > However it did seem to need a dummy change to the LICENSE file to > re-evaluate the license. > > I'll see about fixing the others > > On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 at 01:15, Melloware Inc <melloware...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > In commons beanutils we recommend using /src/conf for these type of > files. > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > > On Mar 8, 2021, at 8:13 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 at 01:08, Bernd Eckenfels <e...@zusammenkunft.net> > wrote: > > >> > > >> Checkstyle-header.txt sounds good and maybe also moving it to a > subdir like src/build/ or src/test/? > > > > > > There are other checkstyle files at the top-level; best to keep them > together. > > > > > >> Gruss > > >> Bernd > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> http://bernd.eckenfels.net > > >> ________________________________ > > >> Von: sebb <seb...@gmail.com> > > >> Gesendet: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 1:41:02 AM > > >> An: CommonsDev <dev@commons.apache.org> > > >> Betreff: GitHub license display confused by LICENSE-header.txt > > >> > > >> Most of the Commons projects show up in GitHub as having the Apache > 2.0 License > > >> > > >> However a few show up as 'other': > > >> > > >> commons-codec > > >> commons-csv > > >> commons-dbutils > > >> commons-exec > > >> commons-jelly > > >> commons-logging > > >> commons-math > > >> commons-rdf > > >> commons-text > > >> commons-weaver > > >> > > >> AFAICT this is because there is more than 1 LICENSE file at the top > level: > > >> I forked codec and deleted the LICENSE-header.txt file, and the > > >> license then showed up as AL 2.0. > > >> > > >> I think it's not only GitHub that might be confused by such files, so > > >> I suggest they are moved or renamed to avoid the confusion. They are > > >> only needed for Checkstyle, so perhaps could be named accordingly, > > >> e.g. checkstyle-header.txt > > >> > > >> [Obviously there would need to be corresponding changes in the pom and > > >> assembly files] > > >> > > >> WDYT? > > >> > > >> Sebb. > > >> > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > >> > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
