On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 at 12:51, Gilles Sadowski <gillese...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Le mar. 9 mars 2021 à 11:58, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > > On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 at 01:39, Gilles Sadowski <gillese...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Le mar. 9 mars 2021 à 01:41, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > > > > > > Most of the Commons projects show up in GitHub as having the Apache 2.0 > > > > License > > > > > > > > However a few show up as 'other': > > > > > > > > commons-codec > > > > commons-csv > > > > commons-dbutils > > > > commons-exec > > > > commons-jelly > > > > commons-logging > > > > commons-math > > > > commons-rdf > > > > commons-text > > > > commons-weaver > > > > > > > > AFAICT this is because there is more than 1 LICENSE file at the top > > > > level: > > > > I forked codec and deleted the LICENSE-header.txt file, and the > > > > license then showed up as AL 2.0. > > > > > > For commons-math, there is a single license file; so the reason > > > must be different. Perhaps the contents (several sections were > > > added below the license text)? > > > Should those be moved to the "NOTICE" file? > > > > I don't thnk that is allowed. > > NOTICE is for required attributions only. > > So, after all, do you mean that > 1. GitHub is just wrong in not detecting that CM is AL2.0, and
Probably. > 2. there is nothing to change for CM No idea. Feel free to experiment in a spare branch. > ? > > Gilles > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
