On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 at 01:08, Bernd Eckenfels <e...@zusammenkunft.net> wrote: > > Checkstyle-header.txt sounds good and maybe also moving it to a subdir like > src/build/ or src/test/?
There are other checkstyle files at the top-level; best to keep them together. > Gruss > Bernd > > > -- > http://bernd.eckenfels.net > ________________________________ > Von: sebb <seb...@gmail.com> > Gesendet: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 1:41:02 AM > An: CommonsDev <dev@commons.apache.org> > Betreff: GitHub license display confused by LICENSE-header.txt > > Most of the Commons projects show up in GitHub as having the Apache 2.0 > License > > However a few show up as 'other': > > commons-codec > commons-csv > commons-dbutils > commons-exec > commons-jelly > commons-logging > commons-math > commons-rdf > commons-text > commons-weaver > > AFAICT this is because there is more than 1 LICENSE file at the top level: > I forked codec and deleted the LICENSE-header.txt file, and the > license then showed up as AL 2.0. > > I think it's not only GitHub that might be confused by such files, so > I suggest they are moved or renamed to avoid the confusion. They are > only needed for Checkstyle, so perhaps could be named accordingly, > e.g. checkstyle-header.txt > > [Obviously there would need to be corresponding changes in the pom and > assembly files] > > WDYT? > > Sebb. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
