Thank you for pointing that out. The IntelliJ annotations used to have Runtime retention, but they now have Class retention.
— Miguel Muñoz On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 7:54 AM Xeno Amess <xenoam...@gmail.com> wrote: > > IntelliJ specifies Runtime retention so they can interact > with IntelliJ's internal JRE, which adds additional assertions into the > code to enforce the annotations. > > seems never. > see this demo repo. > https://github.com/XenoAmess/demo_jetbrains_annotation > > And I looked up the sources and see every annotation classes be > with RetentionPolicy.CLASS or RetentionPolicy.SOURCE > > HOWEVER, I was talking about org.jetbrainss.annotations. > but for jsr305, which is google java codes, I will not be very surprised if > they have different ideas. > > Miguel Muñoz <swingguy1...@gmail.com> 于2020年8月28日周五 下午1:54写道： > > > Good question. IntelliJ specifies Runtime retention so they can interact > > with IntelliJ's internal JRE, which adds additional assertions into the > > code to enforce the annotations. So even though they have Runtime > > retention, they're still a development-phase tool. In production, they > > don't need to be retained at runtime. Personally, I never need the > Runtime > > retention feature, so if we write our own annotations, we can give them > > compile-time retention and they'll work fine. That's often how I work. In > > fact, I often use my own annotations, which don't have Runtime retention, > > and they work fine, so I don't miss that feature. > > > > — Miguel Muñoz > > > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 12:36 PM Jochen Wiedmann < > > jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 9:08 PM sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > AFAIK that means Maven won't download the dependency. > > > > Surely that makes it harder for the developer? > > > > > > No, it means that Maven won't add the dependency to a distribution. > > > > > > However, I've got a question: These annotations have > > > @Retention(Runtime). (See > > > > > > > > > https://www.javadoc.io/doc/com.google.code.findbugs/jsr305/latest/javax/annotation/Nullable.html > > > .) > > > Aren't we enforcing the presence of the respective jar at runtime? > > > > > > > > > Jochen > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Look, that's why there's rules, understand? So that you think before > > > you break 'em. > > > > > > -- (Terry Pratchett, Thief of Time) > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > > > > > >
