Well, French is first my language, so we are in the ESL boat together ;-) I am glad we can converse in a shared language, and it does not have to be Latin or esperanto!
Gary On Sun, Jul 26, 2020, 10:13 Peter Lee <peter...@apache.org> wrote: > It's why apache and open source is so charming and why we all love this so > much. :-) > > cheers, > Lee > > On 7 26 2020, at 10:04 , Rob Tompkins <chtom...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jul 26, 2020, at 9:53 AM, Peter Lee <peter...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Stefan, Rob, Gilles, Gary and all, > > > > > > Please calm. > > > I was just talking that I'm so busy recently ( Too busy in the daytime > that I got home after 12p.m. these days :( ) .I didn't check my mailbox > after my last replay in this thread. Really sorry for my late reply. > > > I'm not complaining. I personally like the dependency bot but I'm just > not familiar with it yet. > > > English is not my first language so I may misused some words. I'm > sorry if I used some words that are not proper enough. > > > > You don’t have to apologize! There are a considerable number of folks on > the list whose second language is English. We’re happy to have everyone > chime in. It makes us a stronger community. :-) > > -Rob > > > Sincely, > > > Lee > > > > > >> On 7 24 2020, at 5:47, Gilles Sadowski <gillese...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> Hi Stefan and all. > > >> > > >> 2020-07-24 8:35 UTC+02:00, Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org>: > > >>>> On 2020-07-24, Rob Tompkins wrote: > > >>> > > >>>>>> On Jul 23, 2020, at 10:16 PM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > >>> > > >>>>> Also, how different is a bot proposing a dependency update from a > human > > >>>>> doing the same? The bot includes far more context about the update > in > > >>>>> the > > >>>>> PR comment, too, which is super useful for determining whether or > not > > >>>>> the > > >>>>> dependency is worth updating. You can even configure it to only > notify > > >>>>> about security updates if it’s too noisy. > > >>> > > >>>> I don’t understand how substantive forward progress on a project > can be > > >>>> considered noisy. It’s just audit. > > >>> > > >>> Oh my, please calm down. > > >> > > >> I didn't "feel" that any of the posts in this thread had an > > >> angry tone, not any more than mine at the beginning of > > >> the other thread. > > >> > > >> Peter's remark, as yours, as mine, makes 3 people asking a > > >> simple question about an as yet unknown source of emails > > >> (that could therefore be qualified as "unsolicited"). > > >> > > >> Perhaps the three of us needed that _prior_ discussion on > > >> "dev@" (i.e. present the proposal) rather than an after the > > >> fact terse statement akin to "go figure yourself". > > >> > > >> Perhaps we needed just that extra little time of a "human" > > >> conversation to be convinced and not even blink at the > > >> subsequent automated emails. > > >> > > >> So a list of "bot" statements (in MD format) is now a good > > >> enough substitute for that "conversation" (?). > > >> > > >> That's the kind of "progress" which GitHub brings (along > > >> with truly good things, I don't doubt, but which are not > > >> what is being pointed at). > > >> > > >>> Peter just said he hasn't been reading mails for a few days, is > > >>> overwhelmed now and will need time to review what has happened. He > > >>> didn't complain, he was apologizing for not responding immediately - > > >>> which he shouldn't feel was necessary IMHO. > > >> > > >> Certainly not he. > > >> Regards, > > >> Gilles > > >> > > >>> > > >>> Stefan > > >> > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > >> > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > >
