On 20 November 2017 at 21:36, Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> > Apache Commons RDF 0.5.0 RC2 is available for review at (r23205): >> > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/rdf/apache-co >> > mmons-rdf-0.5.0-RC2/ >> >> The current rev for this link is 23215, are you sure 23205 is correct? >> > > And currently it's 23217 for me. But that doesn't mean much.
And it's 23227 for me. You need to look at the Last Changed revision: svn info https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/rdf/apache-commons-rdf-0.5.0-RC2/ ... Revision: 23227 Last Changed Rev: 23205 > I'm pretty sure I did push the release on that revision: > > $ svn log -l 1 > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/rdf/apache-commons-rdf-0.5.0-RC2/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > r23205 | wikier | 2017-11-19 13:54:15 -0800 (Sun, 19 Nov 2017) | 1 line > > added correct source release for apache commons rdf 0.5.0 RC2 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > So rev. 23205 is still correct. Subversion handles revisions at a global > level. So the checked out revision will always be '>=', '=' only when no > changes in the overall repository, not just in the subpath. > > >> This source release produces the following binary artifacts: >> > >> > commons-rdf-parent-0.5.0 >> > commons-rdf-api-0.5.0 >> > commons-rdf-simple-0.5.0 >> > commons-rdf-jena-0.5.0 >> > commons-rdf-rdf4j-0.5.0 >> > commons-rdf-jsonld-java-0.5.0 >> > commons-rdf-integration-tests-0.5.0 >> >> You should include the checksums from the email you received from Nexus. >> > > I read that Commons policy. The issues is that I didn't get that email, and > I couldn't find how to easily gather those checksums given the amount of > binary artifacts this source release produces. You should be able to get the email from the mail-archives, e.g. http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/commons-commits/201711.mbox/browser PonyMail! (lists.apache.org) does not currently store Nexus mails (INFRA-12085) > Since I only called to vote the source artifact, I understood the binaries > aren't being actually voted, that's why I didn't dig deeper. But I'm happy > to provide those if someone point me how to gather those checksums from > Nexus. See above. Although binaries are not required, if we do provide them it's important that the archives contain the correct NOTICE and LICENSE files, and don't contain spurious jars etc. > Cheers, --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
