Hello Oliver, Oliver Heger <oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de> schrieb am So., 19. Juni 2016 um 18:00 Uhr:
> > > Am 19.06.2016 um 17:56 schrieb Benedikt Ritter: > > Hello Oliver, > > > > Oliver Heger <oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de> schrieb am So., 19. Juni > 2016 > > um 17:43 Uhr: > > > >> Build works fine with Java 1.7 on Windows 10. Artifacts and site look > >> good (there are a number of PMD and findbugs warnings, but I think this > >> is acceptable). > >> > >> However, I was not able to build the site locally because of: > >> > >> [ERROR] Could not find resource > >> > >> > 'c:\data\dev\projects\OpenSource\bcel\bcel-6.0-src/findbugs-exclude-filter.xml'. > >> -> [Help 1] > >> > >> This file is missing from the source distribution. This prevents me from > >> voting +1. > >> > >> Note: I did a rather technical check of the artifacts and cannot judge > >> if the content is really what the users desire. > >> > > > > To make it easier for me to tally up votes in the end, does this mean > your > > vote is -1? > > I have an interest to see the release coming out, so it is a -0. > Thank you for the clarification. We release sources, not websites. For this reason I do not consider this blocking. I have fixed the problem in rev 1749187 [1]. So if there is another RC it will be fixed. Let's see what others think. Benedikt [1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1749187&view=rev > > Oliver > > > > > Benedikt > > > > > >> Thanks > >> Oliver > >> > >> Am 18.06.2016 um 16:54 schrieb Benedikt Ritter: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> more then 10 years have passed since we've released BCEL 5.2. Users are > >>> waiting for us to release a new version capable of handling Java 6, 7 > >> and 8 > >>> byte code. There have already been 4 release candidates for BCEL 6.0 > but > >>> they have not made it for various reasons. Most importantly BC has been > >>> broken. Package and Maven coordinates have been changed according to > our > >>> release guidelines. However our users have asked us to provide a binary > >>> compatible release and here we are... > >>> > >>> I'd like to call a vote for releasing Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on > >> RC5. > >>> > >>> BCEL 6.0 RC1 is available for review here: > >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/bcel (rev 14039) > >>> > >>> The tag is here: > >>> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/bcel/tags/BCEL_6_0_RC5 > >> (rev > >>> 1749058) > >>> > >>> Maven artifacts are here: > >>> > >>> > >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1177/org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.0/ > >>> > >>> These are the Maven artifacts and their hashes: > >>> > >>> bcel-6.0-javadoc.jar > >>> (SHA1: 79b5fd315f5f949580268e55c0baa85e18df4740) > >>> bcel-6.0-sources.jar > >>> (SHA1: f4ab6e682465471084e601c49e03a1385c610343) > >>> bcel-6.0-test-sources.jar > >>> (SHA1: 9aabf73fd9680336000f54a29fc234eaf474fc85) > >>> bcel-6.0-tests.jar > >>> (SHA1: f34db9121dd7b2dd198754416d29258a96549789) > >>> bcel-6.0.jar > >>> (SHA1: e6546a05530e8ed64b07cb917a8dca7912a16404) > >>> bcel-6.0.pom > >>> (SHA1: 76c9509859b13c74ff082e489b247708c48e59cb) > >>> > >>> I have tested this with Java 7 and 8 using Maven 3.3.9 on Mac OS > 10.11.5. > >>> > >>> Details of changes since 5.2 are in the release notes: > >>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/bcel/RELEASE-NOTES.txt > >>> > >> > http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.0-RC5/changes-report.html > >>> > >>> Site: > >>> http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.0-RC5/ > >>> (note some *relative* links are broken and the 6.0 directories are not > >> yet > >>> created - these will be OK once the site is deployed) > >>> > >>> Clirr Report (compared to 5.2): > >>> > http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.0-RC5/clirr-report.html > >>> > >>> Note that Clirr reports several errors. These have been discussed on > the > >> ML > >>> already and I uploaded the site a while ago giving everybody the > >>> opportunity to raise objections against these changes. These changes > are > >>> also explicitly noted in the Release notes. > >>> > >>> Furthermore java.io.Serializable has been dropped from all BCEL > classes. > >> An > >>> extended Clirr report including this change can be reviewed here: > >>> > >>> > >> > http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.0-RC5/bcel5-bcel6-clirr-report.html > >>> > >>> We don't consider this to be a problem because we don't see a reason > for > >>> users to serialize BCEL classes. > >>> > >>> RAT Report: > >>> > http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.0-RC5/rat-report.html > >>> > >>> KEYS: > >>> https://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS > >>> > >>> Please review the release candidate and vote. > >>> This vote will close no sooner that 72 hours from now, > >>> i.e. sometime after 17:00 CEST 21-June 2016 > >>> > >>> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts > >>> [ ] +0 OK, but... > >>> [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... > >>> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because... > >>> > >>> Thanks! > >>> Benedikt > >>> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >> > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
