Am 19.06.2016 um 17:56 schrieb Benedikt Ritter: > Hello Oliver, > > Oliver Heger <oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de> schrieb am So., 19. Juni 2016 > um 17:43 Uhr: > >> Build works fine with Java 1.7 on Windows 10. Artifacts and site look >> good (there are a number of PMD and findbugs warnings, but I think this >> is acceptable). >> >> However, I was not able to build the site locally because of: >> >> [ERROR] Could not find resource >> >> 'c:\data\dev\projects\OpenSource\bcel\bcel-6.0-src/findbugs-exclude-filter.xml'. >> -> [Help 1] >> >> This file is missing from the source distribution. This prevents me from >> voting +1. >> >> Note: I did a rather technical check of the artifacts and cannot judge >> if the content is really what the users desire. >> > > To make it easier for me to tally up votes in the end, does this mean your > vote is -1?
I have an interest to see the release coming out, so it is a -0. Oliver > > Benedikt > > >> Thanks >> Oliver >> >> Am 18.06.2016 um 16:54 schrieb Benedikt Ritter: >>> Hi, >>> >>> more then 10 years have passed since we've released BCEL 5.2. Users are >>> waiting for us to release a new version capable of handling Java 6, 7 >> and 8 >>> byte code. There have already been 4 release candidates for BCEL 6.0 but >>> they have not made it for various reasons. Most importantly BC has been >>> broken. Package and Maven coordinates have been changed according to our >>> release guidelines. However our users have asked us to provide a binary >>> compatible release and here we are... >>> >>> I'd like to call a vote for releasing Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on >> RC5. >>> >>> BCEL 6.0 RC1 is available for review here: >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/bcel (rev 14039) >>> >>> The tag is here: >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/bcel/tags/BCEL_6_0_RC5 >> (rev >>> 1749058) >>> >>> Maven artifacts are here: >>> >>> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1177/org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.0/ >>> >>> These are the Maven artifacts and their hashes: >>> >>> bcel-6.0-javadoc.jar >>> (SHA1: 79b5fd315f5f949580268e55c0baa85e18df4740) >>> bcel-6.0-sources.jar >>> (SHA1: f4ab6e682465471084e601c49e03a1385c610343) >>> bcel-6.0-test-sources.jar >>> (SHA1: 9aabf73fd9680336000f54a29fc234eaf474fc85) >>> bcel-6.0-tests.jar >>> (SHA1: f34db9121dd7b2dd198754416d29258a96549789) >>> bcel-6.0.jar >>> (SHA1: e6546a05530e8ed64b07cb917a8dca7912a16404) >>> bcel-6.0.pom >>> (SHA1: 76c9509859b13c74ff082e489b247708c48e59cb) >>> >>> I have tested this with Java 7 and 8 using Maven 3.3.9 on Mac OS 10.11.5. >>> >>> Details of changes since 5.2 are in the release notes: >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/bcel/RELEASE-NOTES.txt >>> >> http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.0-RC5/changes-report.html >>> >>> Site: >>> http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.0-RC5/ >>> (note some *relative* links are broken and the 6.0 directories are not >> yet >>> created - these will be OK once the site is deployed) >>> >>> Clirr Report (compared to 5.2): >>> http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.0-RC5/clirr-report.html >>> >>> Note that Clirr reports several errors. These have been discussed on the >> ML >>> already and I uploaded the site a while ago giving everybody the >>> opportunity to raise objections against these changes. These changes are >>> also explicitly noted in the Release notes. >>> >>> Furthermore java.io.Serializable has been dropped from all BCEL classes. >> An >>> extended Clirr report including this change can be reviewed here: >>> >>> >> http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.0-RC5/bcel5-bcel6-clirr-report.html >>> >>> We don't consider this to be a problem because we don't see a reason for >>> users to serialize BCEL classes. >>> >>> RAT Report: >>> http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.0-RC5/rat-report.html >>> >>> KEYS: >>> https://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS >>> >>> Please review the release candidate and vote. >>> This vote will close no sooner that 72 hours from now, >>> i.e. sometime after 17:00 CEST 21-June 2016 >>> >>> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts >>> [ ] +0 OK, but... >>> [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... >>> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because... >>> >>> Thanks! >>> Benedikt >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
