Hello Oliver,

Oliver Heger <oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de> schrieb am So., 19. Juni 2016
um 17:43 Uhr:

> Build works fine with Java 1.7 on Windows 10. Artifacts and site look
> good (there are a number of PMD and findbugs warnings, but I think this
> is acceptable).
>
> However, I was not able to build the site locally because of:
>
> [ERROR] Could not find resource
>
> 'c:\data\dev\projects\OpenSource\bcel\bcel-6.0-src/findbugs-exclude-filter.xml'.
> -> [Help 1]
>
> This file is missing from the source distribution. This prevents me from
> voting +1.
>
> Note: I did a rather technical check of the artifacts and cannot judge
> if the content is really what the users desire.
>

To make it easier for me to tally up votes in the end, does this mean your
vote is -1?

Benedikt


> Thanks
> Oliver
>
> Am 18.06.2016 um 16:54 schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
> > Hi,
> >
> > more then 10 years have passed since we've released BCEL 5.2. Users are
> > waiting for us to release a new version capable of handling Java 6, 7
> and 8
> > byte code. There have already been 4 release candidates for BCEL 6.0 but
> > they have not made it for various reasons. Most importantly BC has been
> > broken. Package and Maven coordinates have been changed according to our
> > release guidelines. However our users have asked us to provide a binary
> > compatible release and here we are...
> >
> > I'd like to call a vote for releasing Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on
> RC5.
> >
> > BCEL 6.0 RC1 is available for review here:
> >   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/bcel (rev 14039)
> >
> > The tag is here:
> >   https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/bcel/tags/BCEL_6_0_RC5
> (rev
> > 1749058)
> >
> > Maven artifacts are here:
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1177/org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.0/
> >
> > These are the Maven artifacts and their hashes:
> >
> > bcel-6.0-javadoc.jar
> > (SHA1: 79b5fd315f5f949580268e55c0baa85e18df4740)
> > bcel-6.0-sources.jar
> > (SHA1: f4ab6e682465471084e601c49e03a1385c610343)
> > bcel-6.0-test-sources.jar
> > (SHA1: 9aabf73fd9680336000f54a29fc234eaf474fc85)
> > bcel-6.0-tests.jar
> > (SHA1: f34db9121dd7b2dd198754416d29258a96549789)
> > bcel-6.0.jar
> > (SHA1: e6546a05530e8ed64b07cb917a8dca7912a16404)
> > bcel-6.0.pom
> > (SHA1: 76c9509859b13c74ff082e489b247708c48e59cb)
> >
> > I have tested this with Java 7 and 8 using Maven 3.3.9 on Mac OS 10.11.5.
> >
> > Details of changes since 5.2 are in the release notes:
> >   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/bcel/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
> >
> http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.0-RC5/changes-report.html
> >
> > Site:
> >   http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.0-RC5/
> > (note some *relative* links are broken and the 6.0 directories are not
> yet
> > created - these will be OK once the site is deployed)
> >
> > Clirr Report (compared to 5.2):
> >   http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.0-RC5/clirr-report.html
> >
> > Note that Clirr reports several errors. These have been discussed on the
> ML
> > already and I uploaded the site a while ago giving everybody the
> > opportunity to raise objections against these changes. These changes are
> > also explicitly noted in the Release notes.
> >
> > Furthermore java.io.Serializable has been dropped from all BCEL classes.
> An
> > extended Clirr report including this change can be reviewed here:
> >
> >
> http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.0-RC5/bcel5-bcel6-clirr-report.html
> >
> > We don't consider this to be a problem because we don't see a reason for
> > users to serialize BCEL classes.
> >
> > RAT Report:
> >     http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.0-RC5/rat-report.html
> >
> > KEYS:
> >   https://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
> >
> > Please review the release candidate and vote.
> > This vote will close no sooner that 72 hours from now,
> > i.e. sometime after 17:00 CEST 21-June 2016
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
> > [ ] +0 OK, but...
> > [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
> > [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Benedikt
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to