sebb wrote:
On 19 May 2016 at 03:14, Josh Elser<els...@apache.org>  wrote:
Hi all,

Worked through the remaining steps for this release. dist.a.o (dev and
release) were both updated, trunk was bumped to 2.2-SNAPSHOT, nexus repo was
released, reporter.a.o was updated, and the svn tag was renamed. I did

It's better to copy rather than rename.

Sorry, I did an `svn cp`, IIRC. Just didn't write the correct verb here :)

remove the checksums on the signatures before promoting the Nexus repository
(thanks for pointing that out Bernd and Sebb). Just pushed all of the
fixVersion=2.1 issues out as well.

Copying from Ralph's 2.0 announcement:

<snip>
The Apache Commons team is pleased to announce the release of Apache Commons
VFS 2.1

We ought to include a paragraph on what VFS does.
The Announce will be seen much wider than just the VFS user community.
Yes, people can check the website, but a brief description would be
very helpful.

I see a sentence on the website that would be easily included. Any suggestions of other text that could be included? Oh, and I guess who all is normally included besides announce@a.o? users@c.a.o? Anyone else?

Details of the changes and bug fixes in this release can be found in
the release notes:
http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/vfs/RELEASE_NOTES.txt

Likewise it would be useful to provide a short summary of the main
changes in the release.
In this case there are so many that it might be hard to summarise, so
perhaps something like:

"VFS 2.1 is binary compatible with 2.0.
It includes many new features and bug fixes; please see the release
notes for details."

The intention of adding this info is to inform potential new users why
they might want to take a look at VFS, and to inform existing users
why they might want to upgrade.

Note that at some point RELEASE_NOTES.txt became RELEASE-NOTES.txt
The former should be deleted from the web site once the announce has occured.

Sounds great. Will include this too.


Anything else I missed?

Any superseded releases need to be removed from dist/release.
It should be safe to do this once the announce has been sent, assuming
the process above has been followed.

Also tidy the RN files (as mentioned above).

Oo, I guess I jumped the gun a little bit here. I cleaned up the 2.0 release when I pushed out 2.1 to dist/release.

S.
P.S. well done and thanks for getting this far.

And thank you for your help too!

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to