All I care about is binary compatibility in a minor release for most cases (not 80% of the cases, but more like 99.9%). I do not want to be in jar hell.
Gary On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 1:04 AM, Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi > > I'm trying to bring together two separate discussions from two different > [VOTE]-threads. It seems as if I should cancel the RC2 vote and before > I rush another RC maybe we can get consensus on what to do. > > * my experiments show that moving the LZWInputStream class hasn't got as > big an impact on subclasses of ZCompressorInputStream as I and others > would have expected. This likely means we can relax the warning of > the release notes and site again. Right? Is anybody going to perform > more experiments? > > * (Internal)LZWInputStream has a bunch of protected fields that slipped > through a few releases ago. We should add getter/setter pairs and > deprecate using the fields. Sebb would like to even make the fields > private assuming the chance of people actually subclassing > ZCompressorInputStream and using said fields is very small. > > Any opinions? > > Stefan > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
