All I care about is binary compatibility in a minor release for most cases
(not 80% of the cases, but more like 99.9%). I do not want to be in jar
hell.

Gary

On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 1:04 AM, Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi
>
> I'm trying to bring together two separate discussions from two different
> [VOTE]-threads.  It seems as if I should cancel the RC2 vote and before
> I rush another RC maybe we can get consensus on what to do.
>
> * my experiments show that moving the LZWInputStream class hasn't got as
>   big an impact on subclasses of ZCompressorInputStream as I and others
>   would have expected.  This likely means we can relax the warning of
>   the release notes and site again.  Right?  Is anybody going to perform
>   more experiments?
>
> * (Internal)LZWInputStream has a bunch of protected fields that slipped
>   through a few releases ago.  We should add getter/setter pairs and
>   deprecate using the fields.  Sebb would like to even make the fields
>   private assuming the chance of people actually subclassing
>   ZCompressorInputStream and using said fields is very small.
>
> Any opinions?
>
> Stefan
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>


-- 
E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory

Reply via email to