Send from my mobile device
> Am 01.02.2015 um 07:04 schrieb Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org>: > > Hi > > I'm trying to bring together two separate discussions from two different > [VOTE]-threads. It seems as if I should cancel the RC2 vote and before > I rush another RC maybe we can get consensus on what to do. > > * my experiments show that moving the LZWInputStream class hasn't got as > big an impact on subclasses of ZCompressorInputStream as I and others > would have expected. This likely means we can relax the warning of > the release notes and site again. Right? Is anybody going to perform > more experiments? I think we're safe to asume that the change will not break clients. > > * (Internal)LZWInputStream has a bunch of protected fields that slipped > through a few releases ago. We should add getter/setter pairs and > deprecate using the fields. Sebb would like to even make the fields > private assuming the chance of people actually subclassing > ZCompressorInputStream and using said fields is very small. Even creating getters and setters and deprecating the fields is the way to go here, IMHO. > > Any opinions? > > Stefan > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
