2015-01-26 17:41 GMT+01:00 sebb <seb...@gmail.com>: > On 26 January 2015 at 12:20, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Ok so you only speak about dist src bundle? > > No, it also affects the binary bundle, and it affects the SVN tag > (which is also a distribution, though not a release) >
Not the bundle since aspectj files are not here and keeping xerox reference is not an issue just something we should avoid if possible nor the tag since the tag is fine (the tag uses module license and global one - bundle - doesnt make any sense). So it only affects sources one. >> Not sure it does need to cancel the vote, this is not a major issue >> IMO and can be fixed for next one > > Given how infrequently releases are made, I don't think that is a good idea. > >> >> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> @rmannibucau >> http://www.tomitribe.com >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com >> https://github.com/rmannibucau >> >> >> 2015-01-26 12:39 GMT+01:00 sebb <seb...@gmail.com>: >>> On 26 January 2015 at 11:30, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> @sebb: not sure I get it right, it references LICENSE.txt correctly for me >>> >>> Not sure what you mean by "it" above. >>> >>> As I already wrote: >>> The NOTICE file should not reference LICENSE.txt >>> Nor should it reference LICENSE.xerox, because the Xerox license does >>> not require attribution. >>> >>> However LICENSE.txt must include - or point to as separate file(s) - >>> any 3rd party licenses for bundled code. >>> It does not reference xerox currently, so there is a problem which >>> arises because of the source file. >>> >>> The user must be able to determine the licensing requirements from >>> LICENSE and NOTICE without having to look around for other license >>> files. >>> And the NOTICE file must not contain anything that is not required. >>> >>>> >>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>> @rmannibucau >>>> http://www.tomitribe.com >>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com >>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau >>>> >>>> >>>> 2015-01-26 12:27 GMT+01:00 sebb <seb...@gmail.com>: >>>>> On 26 January 2015 at 11:19, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> if that's the case +1 but anyway it doesnt hurt >>>>> >>>>> But it does have some consequences, because of the license issues. >>>>> >>>>>> @Thomas: before dropping it can you confirm it a last time please? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>> @rmannibucau >>>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com >>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com >>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 2015-01-26 12:18 GMT+01:00 sebb <seb...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>> Why not just drop it entirely? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If that is the only Xerox-licensed file, it is not essential to the >>>>>>> operation of JCS, so why keep it? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 25 January 2015 at 21:44, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> Hi Mark, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> this is not packaged AFAIK, just here as a sample I guess. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>>>> @rmannibucau >>>>>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com >>>>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com >>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2015-01-25 22:35 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>: >>>>>>>>> is that all? >>>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/jcs/trunk/commons-jcs-core/src/aspect/org/apache/commons/Trace.aj >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Wouldn't it be actually quite easy to replace this? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> LieGrue, >>>>>>>>> strub >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Sunday, 25 January 2015, 19:30, Thomas Vandahl <t...@apache.org> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> > On 25.01.15 17:00, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> It does AFAIK - was not here and just propagated existing legal >>>>>>>>>>> text - and >>>>>>>>>>> that is why it is referenced in core and not all artifacts. >>>>>>>>>>> Le 25 janv. 2015 16:55, "sebb" <seb...@gmail.com> a écrit >>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The XEROX license relates to the file >>>>>>>>>> /commons-jcs-core/src/aspect/org/apache/commons/Trace.aj >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> If the file continues to be part of the distribution, the license >>>>>>>>>> file >>>>>>>>>> must be present, at least that is my understanding of the Apache >>>>>>>>>> requirements. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> This was discussed at length when JCS 1.3 was released. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Bye, Thomas. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
