@sebb: not sure I get it right, it references LICENSE.txt correctly for me
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2015-01-26 12:27 GMT+01:00 sebb <seb...@gmail.com>: > On 26 January 2015 at 11:19, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> if that's the case +1 but anyway it doesnt hurt > > But it does have some consequences, because of the license issues. > >> @Thomas: before dropping it can you confirm it a last time please? >> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> @rmannibucau >> http://www.tomitribe.com >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com >> https://github.com/rmannibucau >> >> >> 2015-01-26 12:18 GMT+01:00 sebb <seb...@gmail.com>: >>> Why not just drop it entirely? >>> >>> If that is the only Xerox-licensed file, it is not essential to the >>> operation of JCS, so why keep it? >>> >>> On 25 January 2015 at 21:44, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> Hi Mark, >>>> >>>> this is not packaged AFAIK, just here as a sample I guess. >>>> >>>> >>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>> @rmannibucau >>>> http://www.tomitribe.com >>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com >>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau >>>> >>>> >>>> 2015-01-25 22:35 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>: >>>>> is that all? >>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/jcs/trunk/commons-jcs-core/src/aspect/org/apache/commons/Trace.aj >>>>> >>>>> Wouldn't it be actually quite easy to replace this? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> LieGrue, >>>>> strub >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Sunday, 25 January 2015, 19:30, Thomas Vandahl <t...@apache.org> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> > On 25.01.15 17:00, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >>>>>>> It does AFAIK - was not here and just propagated existing legal text - >>>>>>> and >>>>>>> that is why it is referenced in core and not all artifacts. >>>>>>> Le 25 janv. 2015 16:55, "sebb" <seb...@gmail.com> a écrit >>>>>> : >>>>>> >>>>>> The XEROX license relates to the file >>>>>> /commons-jcs-core/src/aspect/org/apache/commons/Trace.aj >>>>>> >>>>>> If the file continues to be part of the distribution, the license file >>>>>> must be present, at least that is my understanding of the Apache >>>>>> requirements. >>>>>> >>>>>> This was discussed at length when JCS 1.3 was released. >>>>>> >>>>>> Bye, Thomas. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
