There are some discrepancies between the source artifact and the SVN tag. The source artifact contains derby.log under commons-jcs-jcache-openjpa
The source bundles should not contain the doap file Those problems can be addressed by fixing the appropriate assembly descriptors. Note that the presence of derby.log shows how easy it is for bundles to contain spurious files, and why it is necessary to compare the source bundle with the SVN tag as part of checking the RC. Luckily in this case the file is harmless, but it could have been anything lying around in the workspace. The following directory trees are in SVN but not the source bundle: auxiliary-builds commons-jcs-sandbox src/experimental This is not a blocker, but they are a nuisance when comparing source and SVN. Maybe consider creating a branch and then drop them from trunk? The NOTICE.txt file must not contain references to LICENSE.txt The LICENSE.xerox file does not appear to require attribution, so the NOTICE.txt file must not reference Xerox. The LICENSE.txt file ought to contain the full text of all required licenses; failing that it needs to reference any external files by name. The source jars must have NOTICE and LICENSE files in the META-INF directories -1 for the N&L issues. On 5 December 2014 at 10:11, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > Another try with license/notice files > > - here is the maven repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1065 > - assemblies can be found here > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1065/org/apache/commons/commons-jcs-dist/2.0-beta-1/ > - tag is here: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/jcs/tags/commons-jcs-2.0-beta-1/ > - KEYS: https://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS > - Site staging is: > http://people.apache.org/~rmannibucau/commons-jcs-2.0-beta-1/ > - rat report is (not I delete LICENSE.xerox and zipcodes.txt from this > report directly cause I didn't find a way to configure apache-rat > correctly with maven site): > http://people.apache.org/~rmannibucau/commons-jcs-2.0-beta-1/rat-report.html > > About last vote we spoke about should assembly contain a readme, the > site or something like that, I checked few projects and it doesn't > seem mandatory so I didn't update them. > > Please review the release candidate and vote. > This vote will close no sooner that 72 hours from now or until we get > 3 PMC votes. > > [ ] +1 Release these artifacts > [ ] +-0 OK, but... > [ ] -1 I oppose this release because... > > > Here is my +1 > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau > http://www.tomitribe.com > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com > https://github.com/rmannibucau > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
