On 15.10.14 20:21, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Thomas Vandahl <t...@apache.org> wrote: > >> On 15.10.14 19:55, Gary Gregory wrote: >>> I propose that we use commons-jcs2 instead of commons-jcs, which what >> we've >>> done with other components like commons-math3, commons-lang4, and >>> commons-collection4. >> >> -1 >> >> JCS has not been released from Commons yet. The latest release was from >> Jakarta. We don't have commons-lang2 for example. >> > > The above makes no sense (to me.) > > There was no commons-lang2 because (hopefully) version 2 did _not_ break BC > with version 1. commons-lang3 is named so because it did break BC with > version 2.
I guess that the above policy just was not in place at that time. > Using commons-jcs2 says that it is not compatible with whatever came before > it. > > Using commons-jcs2 follows the convention currently established with the > pattern commons-math3, commons-lang4, and commons-collection4. Yes it's > true that we did not have a commons-jcs but that is besides the point (IMO). Why is that besides the point? There has never been a commons-jcs release as of yet. There used to be (Jakarta-)JCS with completely different maven coordinates. Calling it commons-jcs already says that it is not compatible with anything else. The convention has been established to avoid class loader issues. We don't have that problem here. Bye, Thomas. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
