If the library is going to be called version 2 then personally it should be commons-jcs2. Otherwise the original version from Jakarta should be dropped altogether, and the doc changed so this is treated as version 1.
Whilst the later makes sense from the perspective that this is the first Apache release; I presume most adopters will be updating from the Jakarta version, so the semantics of calling it version 2 make more sense and hence the naming convention of commons-jcs2 Just my two pennies worth James Sent from my iPhone > On 15 Oct 2014, at 18:58, Thomas Vandahl <t...@apache.org> wrote: > >> On 15.10.14 19:55, Gary Gregory wrote: >> I propose that we use commons-jcs2 instead of commons-jcs, which what we've >> done with other components like commons-math3, commons-lang4, and >> commons-collection4. > > -1 > > JCS has not been released from Commons yet. The latest release was from > Jakarta. We don't have commons-lang2 for example. > > Bye, Thomas. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
