On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Thomas Vandahl <t...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 15.10.14 19:55, Gary Gregory wrote: > > I propose that we use commons-jcs2 instead of commons-jcs, which what > we've > > done with other components like commons-math3, commons-lang4, and > > commons-collection4. > > -1 > > JCS has not been released from Commons yet. The latest release was from > Jakarta. We don't have commons-lang2 for example. > The above makes no sense (to me.) There was no commons-lang2 because (hopefully) version 2 did _not_ break BC with version 1. commons-lang3 is named so because it did break BC with version 2. Using commons-jcs2 says that it is not compatible with whatever came before it. Using commons-jcs2 follows the convention currently established with the pattern commons-math3, commons-lang4, and commons-collection4. Yes it's true that we did not have a commons-jcs but that is besides the point (IMO). I can't imagine that this is something we have to put to a VOTE... Gary > Bye, Thomas. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
