Le 10/09/2014 11:43, Gilles a écrit : > This use case does not convince me at all: when working on a feature, > you always do it locally (modifying code, preparing unit tests), and > SVN certainly does not force you to experiment publicly; it's rather > the project's policy that forbids you to commit crappy code. :-)
The advantage here is that you can split you local work into smaller commits before pushing them to the server. That makes the review easier by clearly separating the various steps of the implementation. It's also convenient to rollback some of the changes and correct them without starting from scratch. > [The advantages of "git" must be somewhere else.] Local commits should be one of them though, since it's on the SVN roadmap :) http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3626 Emmanuel Bourg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
