On 10 May 2014 14:13, Thomas Vandahl <t...@apache.org> wrote: > On 05.05.14 19:40, Benedikt Ritter wrote: >> Hi, >> >> we have a pull request at github for [lang] which proposes to introduce new >> methods in NumberUtils that take varargs as input parameters instead of >> arrays [1]. I think a better solution would be to change those old methods >> to use varargs instead of introducing new methods. Since I'm not sure how >> this affects binary compatibility, I'd like to here what others thing about >> this. > > If you look at the generated byte code, the result is identical.
In which case, why do we need to bother to change the source? The compiler only has the byte-code as reference when compiling source that uses the method. > Bye, Thomas. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
