Sorry, but the two parts of your argument seem to be contrary :-) 2014-05-05 20:29 GMT+02:00 Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>:
> It's hard to believe this would not break BC since a ... arg decl is really > an array. > > Gary > > > On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > we have a pull request at github for [lang] which proposes to introduce > new > > methods in NumberUtils that take varargs as input parameters instead of > > arrays [1]. I think a better solution would be to change those old > methods > > to use varargs instead of introducing new methods. Since I'm not sure how > > this affects binary compatibility, I'd like to here what others thing > about > > this. > > > > Clirr doesn't even create an info for a change like this, so I'm assuming > > it can be changed without affecting clients. > > > > Benedikt > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/23 > > > > -- > > http://people.apache.org/~britter/ > > http://www.systemoutprintln.de/ > > http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter > > http://github.com/britter > > > > > > -- > E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition< > http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory > -- http://people.apache.org/~britter/ http://www.systemoutprintln.de/ http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter http://github.com/britter
