It's hard to believe this would not break BC since a ... arg decl is really an array.
Gary On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi, > > we have a pull request at github for [lang] which proposes to introduce new > methods in NumberUtils that take varargs as input parameters instead of > arrays [1]. I think a better solution would be to change those old methods > to use varargs instead of introducing new methods. Since I'm not sure how > this affects binary compatibility, I'd like to here what others thing about > this. > > Clirr doesn't even create an info for a change like this, so I'm assuming > it can be changed without affecting clients. > > Benedikt > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/23 > > -- > http://people.apache.org/~britter/ > http://www.systemoutprintln.de/ > http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter > http://github.com/britter > -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
