On 12/01/2014 17:33, Phil Steitz wrote:
> I am curious why we have a 1.5 branch.  Are there new features (not
> just bug fixes) relative to 1.3/1.4 in there?

JDBC 4.1 support.

> Also, do you guys think it might be time to officially drop 1.3?

No objection from me.

> Getting the the combined 1.3/1.4 release scripts to work in the new
> regime is not something that I personally look forward to.  Just
> pushing out a 1.4.1 would be easier.

My expectation has been that 1.4.x would be auto-generated from the
1.5.x branch. If that is not the case there is stuff to be manually
back-ported.

Mark

> 
> Phil
> 
> On 1/11/14, 7:06 PM, sebb wrote:
>> I've been trying to add a Continuum build for the 1_5 branch, but it won't 
>> take.
>>
>> This may perhaps be due to the fact that the 1_4 branch also uses the
>> same version, i.e.
>>
>> 1.4.1-SNAPSHOT
>>
>> Is this intended, or should the 1_5 branch be using a different version?
>>
>> If the version could (should) be changed, that might work round the
>> Continuum bug
>> [I think it may be making unwarranted assumptions about which
>> identifiers are unique]
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to