On 12/01/2014 17:33, Phil Steitz wrote: > I am curious why we have a 1.5 branch. Are there new features (not > just bug fixes) relative to 1.3/1.4 in there?
JDBC 4.1 support. > Also, do you guys think it might be time to officially drop 1.3? No objection from me. > Getting the the combined 1.3/1.4 release scripts to work in the new > regime is not something that I personally look forward to. Just > pushing out a 1.4.1 would be easier. My expectation has been that 1.4.x would be auto-generated from the 1.5.x branch. If that is not the case there is stuff to be manually back-ported. Mark > > Phil > > On 1/11/14, 7:06 PM, sebb wrote: >> I've been trying to add a Continuum build for the 1_5 branch, but it won't >> take. >> >> This may perhaps be due to the fact that the 1_4 branch also uses the >> same version, i.e. >> >> 1.4.1-SNAPSHOT >> >> Is this intended, or should the 1_5 branch be using a different version? >> >> If the version could (should) be changed, that might work round the >> Continuum bug >> [I think it may be making unwarranted assumptions about which >> identifiers are unique] >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
