Hi,
Am 21.10.2013 19:33, schrieb sebb:
On 21 October 2013 18:27, Andreas Lehmkuehler <andr...@lehmi.de> wrote:
Hi,
Am 21.10.2013 16:25, schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi All,
I happy to see another RC come along! :) This is large code base so I
appreciate that the reports generate a lot of potential work.
I planned to send this email out just over a year ago, shortly after
yours, but since we might actually get to release this time let me
send it out now for reference.
SNIP
I ran a dry maven test (mvn release:prepare -DdryRun=true) and everything
looks good. But I got a lot of redundant artifacts
commons-imaging-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
commons-imaging-1.0-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip
commons-imaging-1.0-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz
commons-imaging-1.0-SNAPSHOT-source-release.zip
commons-imaging-1.0-SNAPSHOT-sources.jar
commons-imaging-1.0-SNAPSHOT-src.zip
commons-imaging-1.0-SNAPSHOT-src.tar.gz
I guess those are not created with intent, are they?
The bin and src zip and targz archives _are_ needed; these are
released to the ASF mirrors.
[That they are attached to the project and end up in Nexus staging is
a long story.]
Is this a commons policy? PDFBox [1] has one source archive and a couple
of precompiled jars (one for each component and 2 bundling all neede components
for 2 typical usecases).
source-release.zip may be spurious.
jar and sources.jar look like standard Maven jars.
Thank you very much
Damjan
Thanks for the ongoing effort to release/work on imaging
BR
Andreas Lehmkühler
BR
Andreas Lehmkühler
[1] http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/pdfbox/1.8.2
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
