I don't like the idea of putting inactive components in the attic -- unless there is some unreasonable length of time that goes by without any development (3 years?). People who want to get things out of the attic are usually a sole passionate fellow. Can a sole fellow unilaterally get a component out of the attic? I wouldn't think so ... but if I am wrong, I would drop my objection.
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org> wrote: > Le 15/10/2013 14:35, Gary Gregory a écrit : > > > the web site can say "last released on yyyy-mm-dd, no new > > releases planned". > > I like this idea, but unless you automate the site update it adds an > extra manual step to the release process. > > Emmanuel Bourg > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > -- Cheers, Paul
