On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 12:40 AM, Dave Brosius <dbros...@apache.org> wrote: > I vote -1 to this process. I see no value in attic-izing projects.
I agree. The attic means graveyard IMO, resurrection is (usually) a big deal, just ask Miracle Max. Gary > > > > > On 10/14/2013 11:55 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: >> >> I contend that all of the Commons components are inactive and should move >> to the Attic/Dormant. In line with Phil's recent suggestion that anyone >> can >> present a dormancy challenge at any time, I'm challenging all of Commons >> Proper. >> >> I've made a file in SVN: >> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/trunks-proper/CHALLENGE.txt >> >> If committers could put their ids next to components they actively monitor >> the commits, JIRA, mailing list for, then we can determine, by >> elimination, >> the components that should be considered for dormancy. >> >> I propose we review the state of the file at the start of November :) >> >> Hen >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition JUnit in Action, Second Edition Spring Batch in Action Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
