Am 11.10.2013 22:55, schrieb Benedikt Ritter: > 2013/10/11 Oliver Heger <oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de> > >> Am 11.10.2013 22:01, schrieb Benedikt Ritter: >>> 2013/10/11 Oliver Heger <oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de> >>> >>>> Am 11.10.2013 02:10, schrieb Phil Steitz: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Oct 10, 2013, at 4:41 PM, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Even I like git and use it daily, I will vote +0,5. >>>>>> >>>>>> Why other apache projects need to have their own commons-csv >>>>>> repackaged release? why tomcat need to use a svn:external on dbcp >>>>>> instead of a released version? why servicemix need to repackage all >>>>>> commons jar to have proper osgi bundles? >>>>>> >>>>>> I simply believe moving to git won't fix those problems about the too >>>>>> complicated release process which scare folks here to try releasing a >>>>>> component!! >>>>>> So no release happen at the end.... >>>>>> >>>>> I agree that the release process is certainly a problem; but the big >>>> problem IMO is just too many components for too few really active >>>> committers. Once we actually have something ready to release, we have >>>> generally been able to fumble our way through the process. The problem >> is >>>> getting there. >>>>> >>>>> I think the best thing we can do is focus on getting some things ready >>>> for release. I will help on pool, DBCP, math. I won't rob Mark of the >>>> oppty to rm pool2, but will help ;). All are welcome to join the fun >>>> cleaning up the docs and other loose ends on that and then dbcp2. >>>>> >>>>> Who wants to step up to drive some other things to release? >>>> I plan to prepare a release of BeanUtils soon. >>>> >>> >>> Good to hear. There is a lot to do. I started generification a while >> back. >>> If you like you can join #asfcommons and we can have a talk about BU. >> >> I did not look into the open issues so far. I would rather take a more >> minimalistic approach, i.e. pushing out version 1.9 with what is >> currently there and then put more energy in BeanUtils2. >> >> > I looked through most issues. There were three categories: > - issues I was unable to fix > - issues I was unable to reproduce > - issues I was unable to understand because they were written in some > strange asian-english mixture > > But we can have another iteration and talk about the things. > Generics can be removed if you want to do a minimal release. It is certainly annoying to have all these generics warnings in the code, especially if there are already some classes that have been adapted. Do you remember roughly how many classes you did rework when you started with generification?
I guess I will start an attempt to generify some classes and see how far this gets and how easy or complicated it is. Then we can decide whether we use generics or not. Oliver > > BU2 is a hole different story. It's more like a prototype. But I'd love to > start work on it again. > > >> Oliver >> >>> >>> Benedikt >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Oliver >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Phil >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 11 October 2013 01:50, James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>>>> All, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We have had some great discussions about moving our SCM to Git. I >>>>>>> think it's time to put it to a vote. So, here we go: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 - yes, move to Git >>>>>>> -1 - no, do not move to Git >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The vote will be left open for 72 hours. Go! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Olivier Lamy >>>>>> Ecetera: http://ecetera.com.au >>>>>> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy >>>>>> >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
