Hi James,

Send from my mobile device

> Am 05.10.2013 um 00:33 schrieb James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>:
> 
> Also, since when did we start nit-picking code in the sandbox?  Why
> not leave these folks alone and let them work out their ideas?  The
> sandbox should be an area where folks can play around with stuff and
> share new ideas without being hassled by folks.  If we make it a pain
> in the butt, then people will just go elsewhere with their cool ideas.
> It's one thing if you're collaborating on the project, but trolling
> commit logs and picking out things you don't like is just plain rude,
> IMHO.

I'm not sure I agree with all of your points. Yes, the sandbox is a place to 
try new ideas out. Does this mean certain quality criterions do not apply? I 
don't think so. This all has to be corrected before promotion, so why not make 
it correct right from the start?

Is pointing out that something may be improved nit-picking? Well, I think it 
depends :-) Just sending a -1 for a commit like this would definitely be. In 
this case an improvement has been pointed out. I'm more then happy for feedback 
like this, because it helps me become a better developer. And in the end, 
discussing commits is part of the game ;-)

Regards,
Benedikt

> 
>> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 6:23 PM, James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> 
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 6:11 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Back to the case in point: why is the string ".activate" and not anything 
>>> else?
>> 
>> Why not just extract a constant and name it something logical like
>> "ACTIVATED_INDICATOR"?  Then, the actual value of the constant can be
>> whatever you want.  The value of the string isn't important (other
>> than making it a bit more human-readable of course).  What is
>> important is that you use the string in a consistent fashion
>> throughout your code.  By not using a constant, it makes it more
>> likely to fat-finger the value when you type it again somewhere.
>> Anyway, I'm sure I'm not telling you anything new.  I just don't think
>> it's relevant to go into a lengthy discussion about the string that's
>> used as some sort of marker.  Just extract the constant (and use it)
>> and move on.
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to