On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > If the same performance gain can be can be achieved with TN's > suggestion, lets go with that. It sure sounds simpler. I can > appreciate that you've put effort into this but that should not be the > driver for acceptance. Can we try that first? We've also worked hard > to have common code for B32 and 64, it would be a shame to loose that. > > Gary
Fair enough. I've reverted r1447443 for now. yours, Julius --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
