On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 09:23:26PM +0100, Olivier Lamy wrote: > 2013/1/9 Gilles Sadowski <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org>: > > On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 04:46:43PM +0100, Olivier Lamy wrote: > >> 2013/1/9 Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org>: > >> > 2013/1/9 Gilles Sadowski <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org>: > >> >> Hi. > >> >> > >> >>> >> [...] > >> >>> >> > Note: currently some content is imported which could be removed (I > >> >>> >> > think about cobertura for modules which use sonar). > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> > What is the status about moving cobertura to a dedicated profile > >> >>> >> > in > >> >>> >> > parent pom ? > >> >>> >> > Can I move it to a reporting profile in parent pom ? > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > For [Math] it would be much better (since AFAIK nobody came up with > >> >>> > a way to > >> >>> > disable Cobertura on a per-component basis). > >> >>> > > >> >>> > From what I infer from looking at the Sonar report page, we could > >> >>> > have the > >> >>> > best of all worlds if every Commons project were registered > >> >>> > indepently in > >> >>> > Sonar. Currently, there is one "Commons Proper Aggregator Project > >> >>> > 1.0-SNAPSHOT" (which does not represent the actual situation that the > >> >>> > components are independent from each other). However, it seems that > >> >>> > with > >> >>> > several projects registered, it could be possible to compare two > >> >>> > versions > >> >>> > of the same project, thereby providing complete information on the > >> >>> > evolution > >> >>> > of the code. Am I wrong? > >> >>> > >> >>> Something like > >> >>> https://analysis.apache.org/dashboard/index/org.apache.commons:commons-exec > >> >>> or > >> >>> https://analysis.apache.org/dashboard/index/org.apache.commons:commons-math3 > >> >>> ? > >> >> > >> >> What I'd like to be clear on the report page is the release versions (of > >> >> Commons Math): the timelines always refer to a non-existent > >> >> "1.0-SNAPSHOT". > >> >> See e.g. > >> >> https://analysis.apache.org/dashboard/index/122571?did=4&period=3 > >> >> > >> > > >> > I see (this generates extra maintenance on analysis.a.o as I need to > >> > created a job per project) > >> > But I will > >> done see: > >> https://analysis.apache.org/dashboard/index/org.apache.commons:commons-math3 > > > > Thanks. > > Will there be something to be done for each release, or is there some > > automagic link between sonar and Jira (or SVN?) that can remember when some > > release happened and add the little triangle? > Not sure of that but it looks sonar detect versions from pom. > As sample see https://analysis.apache.org/dashboard/index/35142?did=4
That's close, but the ideal would be that official release also appear in the tables. And that will not happen by reading the pom file because there, the version is always in the form "x.y[.z]-SNAPSHOT". Would it be possible to request a "one-time" analysis by pointing Sonar to the SVN tag of the new official release? [And have that analysis inserted in the time-line of course ;-).] Best regards, Gilles --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
