Hi. > >> [...] > >> > Note: currently some content is imported which could be removed (I > >> > think about cobertura for modules which use sonar). > >> > > >> > What is the status about moving cobertura to a dedicated profile in > >> > parent pom ? > >> > Can I move it to a reporting profile in parent pom ? > >> > > > > > For [Math] it would be much better (since AFAIK nobody came up with a way to > > disable Cobertura on a per-component basis). > > > > From what I infer from looking at the Sonar report page, we could have the > > best of all worlds if every Commons project were registered indepently in > > Sonar. Currently, there is one "Commons Proper Aggregator Project > > 1.0-SNAPSHOT" (which does not represent the actual situation that the > > components are independent from each other). However, it seems that with > > several projects registered, it could be possible to compare two versions > > of the same project, thereby providing complete information on the evolution > > of the code. Am I wrong? > > Something like > https://analysis.apache.org/dashboard/index/org.apache.commons:commons-exec > or > https://analysis.apache.org/dashboard/index/org.apache.commons:commons-math3 > ?
What I'd like to be clear on the report page is the release versions (of Commons Math): the timelines always refer to a non-existent "1.0-SNAPSHOT". See e.g. https://analysis.apache.org/dashboard/index/122571?did=4&period=3 Regards, Gilles --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
