On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 08:37:33AM -0500, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Gilles Sadowski < > gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 07:25:45AM -0500, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > IMO code coverage should be part of the standard documentation for a > > > component. Looking at code coverage helps establish or shake my > > > confidence in a component. It should definitively be part of ones > > > development checklist, I like to have the best code coverage for any > > > new code that I check in. > > > > > > Gary > > > > > > On Jan 9, 2013, at 5:16, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Folks, > > > > I have started importing some content for sub projects (exec, > > > > collections). I will try to do more later. > > > > > > > > Where is the place to document that ? > > > > > > > > Note: currently some content is imported which could be removed (I > > > > think about cobertura for modules which use sonar). > > > > > > > > What is the status about moving cobertura to a dedicated profile in > > > > parent pom ? > > > > Can I move it to a reporting profile in parent pom ? > > > > > > > > For [Math] it would be much better (since AFAIK nobody came up with a way > > to > > disable Cobertura on a per-component basis). > > > > From what I infer from looking at the Sonar report page, we could have the > > best of all worlds if every Commons project were registered indepently in > > Sonar. Currently, there is one "Commons Proper Aggregator Project > > 1.0-SNAPSHOT" (which does not represent the actual situation that the > > components are independent from each other). However, it seems that with > > several projects registered, it could be possible to compare two versions > > of the same project, thereby providing complete information on the > > evolution > > of the code. Am I wrong? > > > > Sonar has no value for local development though (before you commit). I need > the reports to run locally when, for example, I am improving code coverage, > fixing FindBugs, PMD, and Checkstyle issues.
Nothing will prevent you to run Cobertura by calling the new profile explicitly. We've explained that Cobertura is a PITA for Commons Math developers. Thanks, Gilles --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
